Tag Archives: Releases

Watchmen

I’ve been anticipating the movie adaption of Watchmen for months now, since the first time I ever saw the trailer. Watchmen (the movie) is based on Watchmen, the wildly popular graphic novel, and tells the story of a group of retired masked vigilantes, The Watchmen. The action takes place in 1985, although the earlier arrival of a superhuman figure named Dr. Manhattan has altered the course of world events: Vietnam surrendered to America, technology has advanced at an extremely accelerated rate, and human masked vigilantes have been outlawed by President Nixon, in his third term of the presidency. The narrative is told by Rorschach, a paranoid, sociopathic detective-type vigilante, the only Watchman still operational. The movie opens with the death of The Comedian, one of the disguised heroes, and the main plot is Rorschach trying to figure out who is responsible.

I won’t go too much more into the plot, but needless to say – it is very interesting to watch and read. The thing that really amazed me about the movie was how similar it was to the comic. While watching the movie, the exact same emotions and thoughts rolled through my head as when I was reading the book. The style and feel of the movie is the same as the book, the characters look and sound exactly as I imagined (with the exception of one character, Adrian Veidt), and it was overall just really well-made.

There are three problems I have with the movie, however.

The first problem is Veidt. While all of the other characters in the movie (particularly Rorschach, who was absolutely perfect in every way) were extremely well-cast, Veidt looked nothing like he did in the comic book. Veidt is the alter-ego of ex-vigilante Ozymandias, the smartest man in the world. In both versions of the story, Veidt is extremely wealthy, intelligent, and obsessed with Alexander the Great and all sorts of ancient civilizations. However, in the comic Veidt resembled a Roman emperor in appearance. He had a classically beautiful look to him, and wore purple and gold. His office was highly gilded, and he seemed warm, but regal. In the movie, however, Veidt appears almost scrawny. His armor helps him appear stronger, but it is entirely black and silver, not Ozy’s purple and gold. The same goes for his workspace, being entirely gray marble and black rock. Also, his feline companion, Bubastis, is blue instead of red for some reason.

Another issue I had with the movie was the lack of detail in certain scenes, and the addition of detail in others. The movie is already 2 hours and 40 minutes long, so obviously some scenes had to be cut down a bit, but unfortunately it’s the origin stories that lose out. Rorschach and Dr. Manhattan both had very interesting stories in the comic, explaining how they really became the heroes they are at the time of the action, but these are cut down to the bare minimum in the movie. Rorschach in the comic is forced to talk to a psychoanalyst, and over time he slowly breaks him down from a jolly fat man to a gibbering, depressed, shell of his former self. In the movie, Rorschach has one session with said therapist, and that’s it. We are still shown some of his origin, but it is condensed into a single scene. The same thing happens with Dr. Manhattan, who comprehends time differently from humans. For him, all time is simultaneous, he sees all of his past and all of his future at the same time. This makes for a very interesting origin story, as it doesn’t necessarily progress in chronological order. This was shown in the movie, but it wasn’t nearly as interesting as in the comic, and a number of crucial scenes from his past were removed.

At the same time, some details were left in that were unnecessary, and some were even added in. The biggest problem, I thought, was the sex scene. It lasted quite a bit longer than it had to, and while I do think the scene itself was important to have in the film, it shouldn’t have been long enough to require the removal of actual content. I do, however, applaud the parties responsible for the movie for leaving many of the R-rated aspects of the movie unchanged.

The final problem I had was the soundtrack. While the music chosen was awesone (Dylan, Simon & Garfunkel, Hendrix, etc.), it seemed to not really fit the action. Particularly the scene of Dr. Manhattan in Vietnam, with Ride of the Valkyries in the background. The song is awesome, and fits, but it is such a cliché that it didn’t work. I would have liked more original music, with one or two oldies every now and then.

Apart from these three, however, I loved the movie, and would recommend it to anybody who likes (super)hero movies with less action than normal (which isn’t to say less blood), and more mystery and plot.

Tagged , ,

Watchmen

I’ve been anticipating the movie adaption of Watchmen for months now, since the first time I ever saw the trailer. Watchmen (the movie) is based on Watchmen, the wildly popular graphic novel, and tells the story of a group of retired masked vigilantes, The Watchmen. The action takes place in 1985, although the earlier arrival of a superhuman figure named Dr. Manhattan has altered the course of world events: Vietnam surrendered to America, technology has advanced at an extremely accelerated rate, and human masked vigilantes have been outlawed by President Nixon, in his third term of the presidency. The narrative is told by Rorschach, a paranoid, sociopathic detective-type vigilante, the only Watchman still operational. The movie opens with the death of The Comedian, one of the disguised heroes, and the main plot is Rorschach trying to figure out who is responsible.

I won’t go too much more into the plot, but needless to say – it is very interesting to watch and read. The thing that really amazed me about the movie was how similar it was to the comic. While watching the movie, the exact same emotions and thoughts rolled through my head as when I was reading the book. The style and feel of the movie is the same as the book, the characters look and sound exactly as I imagined (with the exception of one character, Adrian Veidt), and it was overall just really well-made.

There are three problems I have with the movie, however.

The first problem is Veidt. While all of the other characters in the movie (particularly Rorschach, who was absolutely perfect in every way) were extremely well-cast, Veidt looked nothing like he did in the comic book. Veidt is the alter-ego of ex-vigilante Ozymandias, the smartest man in the world. In both versions of the story, Veidt is extremely wealthy, intelligent, and obsessed with Alexander the Great and all sorts of ancient civilizations. However, in the comic Veidt resembled a Roman emperor in appearance. He had a classically beautiful look to him, and wore purple and gold. His office was highly gilded, and he seemed warm, but regal. In the movie, however, Veidt appears almost scrawny. His armor helps him appear stronger, but it is entirely black and silver, not Ozy’s purple and gold. The same goes for his workspace, being entirely gray marble and black rock. Also, his feline companion, Bubastis, is blue instead of red for some reason.

Another issue I had with the movie was the lack of detail in certain scenes, and the addition of detail in others. The movie is already 2 hours and 40 minutes long, so obviously some scenes had to be cut down a bit, but unfortunately it’s the origin stories that lose out. Rorschach and Dr. Manhattan both had very interesting stories in the comic, explaining how they really became the heroes they are at the time of the action, but these are cut down to the bare minimum in the movie. Rorschach in the comic is forced to talk to a psychoanalyst, and over time he slowly breaks him down from a jolly fat man to a gibbering, depressed, shell of his former self. In the movie, Rorschach has one session with said therapist, and that’s it. We are still shown some of his origin, but it is condensed into a single scene. The same thing happens with Dr. Manhattan, who comprehends time differently from humans. For him, all time is simultaneous, he sees all of his past and all of his future at the same time. This makes for a very interesting origin story, as it doesn’t necessarily progress in chronological order. This was shown in the movie, but it wasn’t nearly as interesting as in the comic, and a number of crucial scenes from his past were removed.

At the same time, some details were left in that were unnecessary, and some were even added in. The biggest problem, I thought, was the sex scene. It lasted quite a bit longer than it had to, and while I do think the scene itself was important to have in the film, it shouldn’t have been long enough to require the removal of actual content. I do, however, applaud the parties responsible for the movie for leaving many of the R-rated aspects of the movie unchanged.

The final problem I had was the soundtrack. While the music chosen was awesone (Dylan, Simon & Garfunkel, Hendrix, etc.), it seemed to not really fit the action. Particularly the scene of Dr. Manhattan in Vietnam, with Ride of the Valkyries in the background. The song is awesome, and fits, but it is such a cliché that it didn’t work. I would have liked more original music, with one or two oldies every now and then.

Apart from these three, however, I loved the movie, and would recommend it to anybody who likes (super)hero movies with less action than normal (which isn’t to say less blood), and more mystery and plot.

Tagged , ,

Picasa For Mac

Picasa, Google’s photo manager program, has finally been released for Mac OS X. This is absolutely great news for people like me, who despise iPhoto. iPhoto is ridiculously slow and inefficient in my experience, and (like a lot of other things on OS X) doesn’t really offer a lot of options on how behind-the-scenes organization will take place, so photos get hidden in big file trees, ending with the ‘Roll’, which is completely nondescript and unhelpful when looking for files. More recent versions of iPhoto are even worse, packing all of the photos into a single pseudofile: like a .app, it is actually a folder that has been given a file extention. This means that its still relatively easy to access your photos, but it makes actions like backing up photos or accessing them from other programs very difficult. In short, I don’t like iPhoto.

However, up until now, there haven’t really been any other options. Microsoft doesn’t really offer a built-in method of photo organization (or at least, they didn’t before Windows 7, which uses special ‘Library’ folders that can be used for photo organization, I think), so there are lots of programs out there for Windows photo organization (like Picasa). Since iPhoto is pre-installed on every Mac, nobody has really bothered to write up an alternative photo manager.

Picasa was my photo manager of choice on Windows, has traditionally been only for Windows and (infuriatingly) Linux. This has never made sense to me. Obviously, this is a very cross-platform application if it can be run on Windows and Linux, so how hard could it be to get it running on a Mac? Apparently very hard, as Picasa 3 for Mac is only in Beta at this point, and it has taken Google this long to get that far.

Anyway, the application itself is very nice. I like it a lot more than iPhoto for many reasons, but I miss some things from iPhoto. For one thing, Picasa is not really a photo manager as much as a picture manager. When you launch it, it scans your whole home folder looking for images, and displays them all, categorized by folder. It tries to sort the folders by date, but it seems to have a very tough time doing this (most of the years assigned to my folders are a year or two off, while some are dated 1990 and as far back as 1969…). I want a way to exclude folders entirely from its scan, but I have not found a way to do this yet. To make up for this lacking feature, Picasa categorizes its sources and allows you to minimize the ones you don’t want to see (for example, I have Albums, iPhoto Library, and one other specific folder opened, but the main folder hierarchies are minimized, because they add a lot of noise).

The folders category adds unwanted noise...

Picasa doesn’t really organize at all behind the scenes, it seems to just want to display the pictures as it finds them on your machine, and leave the organization to the user. I like this more than iPhoto, because it gives me complete control over organization and makes things a lot easier to find (inside the Pictures/Picasa folder that I made, I make a specific folder for each photo shoot, and then inside that, one folder for each camera or lens used). Picasa neatly recognizes my organizational system and displays the shoot folder as a category in the sidebar, with the folders under it.

The main Picasa screen

One thing I don’t like so far is that Picasa doesn’t seem that much more efficient than iPhoto. It certainly loads faster, opening almost as soon as I launch it, while iPhoto can take up to 30 seconds to get to a usable state, and even longer to quit. However, both applications use a lot of resources on my machine, if either is running in the background my fans start going nuts before long. Picasa is, however, still only a beta, so it’s very likely that it will become better soon.

Overall, I really like Picasa, a lot more than iPhoto, and I’d recommend it to anybody who’s as fed up with iPhoto as I am.

Tagged , ,

Windows 7

So as some people may have heard, the first beta of Windows 7 (aka build 7000) has been leaked onto the internet. For those of you who haven’t heard, and have no idea what I’m talking about, Windows 7 is Microsoft’s next operating system (the replacement for Vista, just as Vista was the replacement for XP before it). Despite my dislike for Windows Vista, which is a bloated and unusable operating system on most machines, I decided that I ought to try out Windows 7 for myself, since Microsoft claims that it is much faster than Vista.

Well, after a bit of trouble burning it to a disk (fourth time’s the charm!), I finally got the OS up and running on my machine. Let me start of by saying that for the most part, Microsoft is completely right: 7 is amazingly fast. For the most part. Compared to Vista. The impressive thing is that the machine I’m running 7 on is somewhat old, a 2.93ghz Celeron cpu with 512mb of ram, and yet it manages to pull off full Aero effects at full speed (by which I mean it runs at the same speed as Windows XP on the same machine, give or take a bit). Admittedly, I do have a pretty good graphics card to go with the crappy processor and memory, but Vista didn’t even give me the option of enabling Aero, so this is definitely a step up. Overall my machine gets a 2.9 in the experience index (which, by the way, now goes up to 7.9 instead of 5.9) – limited by my memory.

Windows 7 is currently installed at the back of my computer, on the second partition of my secondary hard drive, which it seems to be dealing with just fine. It is completely comfortable being installed alongside Windows XP, and by default gives me the option to boot an older version of Windows or 7, which is really nice. Annoyingly, it doesn’t automatically mount the other hard drive (which is C:\\ for Windows XP), but I got it to mount as a C:\\Windows XP folder with no problems.

Even though this is only a beta, it is surprisingly stable. I don’t really think much of the stability of Windows in the first place, so the amount of instability present in 7 is practically acceptable. The most annoying thing is the Windows Explorer crash every time I log in, which is easily fixed by relaunching it. Apart from that, there have been a few minor crashes every now and then, and a few places where it’s obvious that a little polish is still needed (notably the help files).

Compatability-wise, 7 is surprisingly friendly with almost all of my hardware by default. During the system installation it managed to connect to my WiFi, and has been connected flawlessly ever since then. Seriously, two thumbs way up for Microsoft on getting the WiFi thing down. It never asks me which network to connect to, and never bugs me when it can’t connect (because it always manages to connect). Also, I love the fact that Windows 7 doesn’t bug me about empty ethernet ports like every other version of Windows does. All I have in my taskbar is the WiFi connection level and some system warnings (get a virus scanner, turn on updates, blah blah blah), both of which I could hide if I so chose. The one piece of hardware 7 seems to be having trouble with is my sound processor, which isn’t surprising as no version of Windows seems to be able to install this chip by default (the VIA Vinyl AC’97 or something).

On the software side, things in general seem to work (including Uru, which is actually faster, if anything), with the exception of the programs that rely on audio (all of which just complain about the lack of an audio device before quitting themselves – Myst, Riven, etc). I cannot get the installer for my audio chip drivers to work, which is very annoying. However, overall this seems like a very good OS in terms of compatibility.

I like the superbar a lot. It really has to be seen to fully appreciate it, but basically the superbar is the new taskbar. Applications appear now as tiles on the bar, and the quicklaunch is gone – replaced with ‘pinned’ applications, which are always present on the bar. Icons have menus that pop up when right-clicked, and if more than one window is open for an application, a small extra bar is added to the right side of the tile, one bar for each extra window. It’s a subtle way to show how many windows you have open, and much nicer than the grouping that old taskbars did.

Overall, I’m really enjoying Windows 7. Apart from the small assortment of glitches listed above, the environment is very stable and speedy, and a lot nicer looking than XP and Vista. Thanks to a patch I found online, I have Windows 7 until July, at which point there should be a newer build out anyway. I very much want to upgrade my XP installation rather than dual-boot, but the problems listed above force me not to (plus I don’t think the leaked beta even allows upgrading yet). As of this moment, I do plan on buying a copy (or at least trying to get a copy from a friend at Microsoft) of Windows 7 when it comes out. If I could, I would even install it on Eve, it’s just that good.

Tagged , ,

Bowtie and Coversutra – Match Made in Heaven

I’ve posted about CoverSutra before, specifically about its appearance. I didn’t like the default look of the search bar or desktop album art, so I found a collection of modifications that created an interface I liked.

A few days ago I discovered a program with similar abilities to CoverSutra, called Bowtie. It provides a window which one can use to control iTunes, and the bonus of Bowtie over CoverSutra is its skinability. It comes with 11 skins by default, but by looking around the MacThemes Forums, one can find many, many more great themes.

I was considering switching over to Bowtie completely, especially considering that it’s free, but it lacked a few things that CoverSutra has, which I think are very necessary. The first of these, and the most apparent to me, is the lack of a ‘hide from dock’ option, resulting in it always taking up space on the dock, even though it’s a very small app, and doesn’t really warrant a dock icon. A menu bar item, like CoverSutra uses, would be much better for this kind of application. This inadequacy can be remedied, however, with a small app called Dock Dodger, which can hide any application from the dock and cmd+tab switcher.

The other feature Bowtie lacks is the ability to search through the iTunes library, which is pretty much the core of CoverSutra. Upon this realization, it became clear that running Bowtie and CoverSutra side-by-side was definitely a viable option. Using Dock Dodger, I have Bowtie hidden in the background, so that I can use its interface instead of CoverSutra’s desktop album art (the Bowtie theme called ‘Wet Floor’ is really good for this usage), while I continue to use CoverSutra as my main music navigator.

As a final note, I feel I should mention that up until Bowtie, I still used my perennial favorite utility, Quicksilver, for my iTunes-related hotkey needs. CoverSutra’s hotkeys work great, but I found that there was no way to get the CoverSutra notification under the menu bar to appear when using CoverSutra’s own hotkeys to change the song, so I refrained from using them. However, Quicksilver hotkeys can be somewhat sluggish at first, and Bowtie loads faster at boot-up than Quicksilver, so I recently moved my play/pause and next/previous hotkeys over to Bowtie, and my increase/decrease volume & rating hotkeys to CoverSutra. This setup has treated me well so far, and I’m very happy with it.

Tagged , , ,

Bowtie and Coversutra – Match Made in Heaven

I’ve posted about CoverSutra before, specifically about its appearance. I didn’t like the default look of the search bar or desktop album art, so I found a collection of modifications that created an interface I liked.

A few days ago I discovered a program with similar abilities to CoverSutra, called Bowtie. It provides a window which one can use to control iTunes, and the bonus of Bowtie over CoverSutra is its skinability. It comes with 11 skins by default, but by looking around the MacThemes Forums, one can find many, many more great themes.

I was considering switching over to Bowtie completely, especially considering that it’s free, but it lacked a few things that CoverSutra has, which I think are very necessary. The first of these, and the most apparent to me, is the lack of a ‘hide from dock’ option, resulting in it always taking up space on the dock, even though it’s a very small app, and doesn’t really warrant a dock icon. A menu bar item, like CoverSutra uses, would be much better for this kind of application. This inadequacy can be remedied, however, with a small app called Dock Dodger, which can hide any application from the dock and cmd+tab switcher.

The other feature Bowtie lacks is the ability to search through the iTunes library, which is pretty much the core of CoverSutra. Upon this realization, it became clear that running Bowtie and CoverSutra side-by-side was definitely a viable option. Using Dock Dodger, I have Bowtie hidden in the background, so that I can use its interface instead of CoverSutra’s desktop album art (the Bowtie theme called ‘Wet Floor’ is really good for this usage), while I continue to use CoverSutra as my main music navigator.

As a final note, I feel I should mention that up until Bowtie, I still used my perennial favorite utility, Quicksilver, for my iTunes-related hotkey needs. CoverSutra’s hotkeys work great, but I found that there was no way to get the CoverSutra notification under the menu bar to appear when using CoverSutra’s own hotkeys to change the song, so I refrained from using them. However, Quicksilver hotkeys can be somewhat sluggish at first, and Bowtie loads faster at boot-up than Quicksilver, so I recently moved my play/pause and next/previous hotkeys over to Bowtie, and my increase/decrease volume & rating hotkeys to CoverSutra. This setup has treated me well so far, and I’m very happy with it.

Tagged , , ,

LittleBigPlanet

It’s pretty rare for me to really like a video game, or at least it’s rare for me to like it enough to actually want to play the game all the time. I usually only discover such an addictive game about once a year. The last time that it happened was with Rock Band back in the spring, Kingdom Hearts a few years that, and way back when, the Myst series.

However, last friday (Halloween), one of my friends lent me LittleBigPlanet for the week, and I’ve been been spending most of my free time since then playing the amazing thing (I actually gave my friend back his copy on thursday, and went out yesterday to purchase my own). The game is beautiful, creative, addictive, unique, intuitive, and above all else, fun. Of course, I’ve known about LittleBigPlanet for more than a year. The trailers and gameplay videos for it during the summer of 2007 were big factors in my purchasing of a Playstation 3 in the first place, so one could say I actually spend $500 to play this game (or, if you consider the fact that I bought my HDTV to go with the PS3 around the same time, one could actually say that I spent over $1000 to play it).

Sackboy

In LittleBigPlanet, you play as Sackboy (above), a character made out of cloth (hence his name), and run around LittleBigPlanet (a physical manifestation of all of the dreams and imaginative energies of the people of Earth), exploring and collecting items. Items include stickers (which can be stuck anywhere in the game, even on other characters), decorations (which are like 3-dimensional stickers, and can also be stuck on anything in the game), and costumes, among other things. The costumes are a very fun part of the game, because you can really customize your Sackboy a lot using them (see below).

Customized sackpeople

Besides the story mode (the main levels of the game, tied together into some sort of loose, disjointed story), there’s also the “MyMoon” area, where you can create your own levels. As you play through the official levels of LittleBigPlanet, you collect the objects from the official levels as items, allowing you to (in theory) re-create the official levels entirely, or build your own worlds. When you’ve created a level that you like, you can publish it, so other people can download and play in it themselves. You can also download and play levels that other people have made, some of which are really amazing.

Building a level

Perhaps one of the best features of this already amazing game is the multiplayer gameplay. Up to 4 people can play at the same time, working cooperatively to finish the levels together. In my opinion, this is the best form of multiplayer gameplay (that is, 4 people in the same room working together, while the second best is online cooperative, then real-life competitive, and online competitive being the worst form of multiplayer), because it really feels like a group effort, and you’re playing with people you really know, and having fun together. LittleBigPlanet is a very social game, it’s actually impossible to complete it 100% on your own, there are a lot of two-player puzzles to get secret items and such.

Hanging onto a cloud

LittleBigPlanet is definitely my favorite PS3 game thus far. I would strongly recommend it to anybody and everybody.

Tagged , , ,

Google Chrome Released

Today, Google released their very own browser, called Google Chrome. It isn’t available yet for Mac and Linux, but I tried it out on my PC and it is smooth. Installing was painless and quick, and it imported my Firefox history in less than 3 seconds, which was very nice, since I usually rely on my history rather than bookmarks on my PC.

Google Chrome

Chrome’s address bar is called the OmniBox, and so far I like it way more than Firefox’s AwesomeBar. If you just type in words, without www. or .com, it will automatically do a google search (or whatever your default search engine is) for whatever you typed. In addition, if you type the URL of a search engine (www.youtube.com, www.yahoo.com, etc), and press Tab, you can then type the search term in the address bar. This is extremely nice, as Chrome doesn’t support the bookmark keywords that I rely on for searches in Firefox.

Tab to search is awesome.

Another nice touch in the OmniBox is that if it auto-completes your URL, the part you typed is slightly darker than the parts it added (you can see this in the screenshot below).

The auto-completed parts are light gray, while what I typed is black.

Another cool feature is the ability to make standalone applications of web pages. This puts in item on your Desktop (and/or the Start Menu and the Quicklaunch bar), which will open a separate browser window for that site when you launch it. The window has no address bar or navigation buttons, it’s just the page and scrollbar. This is designed specifically for web-based applications, allowing you to have a separate application specifically for, say, a gmail account. It shows up on the task bar as the site’s title, with its favicon, as opposed to that of Chrome.

The ‘incognito’ windows are very cool as well, with a darker, more mysterious theme. While browsing in incognito windows, you won’t leave any trail (no history, no caching, no cookies, nothing), much like the Private Browsing mode in Safari. While I’m sure I can’t think of any reason someone would want to browse the internet like this, I bet many people will find this feature very enticing.

Incognito windows let you browse in secrecy.

I don’t really like the fact that more and more Windows applications are ditching menubars in favor for drop-down buttons (see Windows Media Player 11 and Internet Explorer 7, among others). This is really disorienting, because there’s no longer a central place to access menus that’s constant across all programs. This gives the user a scavenger hunt every time they install a new application to try to deduce where the menus are, instead of being able to simply enjoy the application.

Apart from that one detail, I really like most of Chrome. It really is much, much faster than Firefox, and very pretty. The shade of blue Google used for the Titlebar happens to be my favorite color, which is very easy on the eyes. As soon as this browser comes out for Mac, I’ll seriously consider replacing Firefox.

Tagged , , ,

Tropic Thunder

Tropic Thunder

I finally saw Tropic Thunder, Ben Stiller’s new comedy about the making of a Vietnam movie, and I found it hilarious. The star-studded cast (in addition to Stiller, there’s Robert Downey Jr, Jack Black, Nick Nolte, and an amazing cameo by Tom Cruise) is great, and managed to keep me laughing for almost the entirety of the movie. The movie begins with trailers for the products and movies of the fictional actors, setting the stage for their personalities on the set of Tropic Thunder. As the production of the movie slides further and further downhill, the veteran who wrote the book the action movie is based on (played by Nolte) suggests dropping the actors into a forest rigged with explosives and hidden cameras, to capture real fear and make the movie “the best war movie ever”.

It all deteriorates from there, as the director is almost immediately accidentally blown up, and the token Asian drug ring shows up, mistaking the actors for American soldiers (who in turn mistake them for actors, playing out parts in the script). All hell breaks loose as the actors slowly begin to understand that they are no longer filming a movie, but fighting for their lives and those of their friends and comrades.

This makes the movie sound very serious, which it isn’t at all. It’s completely silly, from the drug ring being run by a 12-year old who’s only ever seen one movie (Simple Jack, one of Stiller’s character’s movies, in which he portrays a lovable mentally disabled boy named Jack), to the impressive stream of obscenity issued by the producer of the movie (Cruise), to Downey Jr.’s character undergoing major surgery to turn himself into a black man, and subsequently falling completely into the role, convincing himself he really is the character he’s supposed to be portraying.

The movie is hilarious, but not for the faint of heart. There are many shots, particularly near the beginning, of people’s guts spilling out of them, and more than one person explodes in the course of the movie. A lot of the jokes could very easily offend people (and they have), but I don’t think that there are any jokes bad enough to merit skipping the movie entirely. Honestly, I would say the opposite: Tropic Thunder is a must-see, possibly one of the funniest movies of the year.

Tagged , ,

Star Wars: The Clone Wars

Warning: long rant ahead. Summary: Terrible movie.

This movie was a huge disappointment, from the very beginning. I had been wondering, before seeing the film, how Lucasfilm would handle the opening, since the Star Wars movies usually start with the now emblematic text crawl, (which sets the stage for the action in the movie) at the top of which is the episode number and name. Since this movie is not technically an episode of the Star Wars saga, I had assumed that instead of saying Episode 2.5 – The Clone Wars, they would put simply The Clone Wars.

Turns out, I was wrong. Instead of the opening crawl of text, there is a montage of action sequences and a (somewhat cheesy, in my opinion) narration of the events. This scene could easily have been a text crawl, but in an effort to make the movie more kid-friendly the director instead opted to blatantly show the action instead of leaving it to the viewers’ imaginations. As a result, before I was 5 minutes into the movie, before any main characters had even been shown on-screen, I was already horrified at the thought that I had actually paid money to see this blasphemous excuse for a Star Wars movie.

And that was just the opening titles.

General Obi-Wan Kenobi

For the entire duration of the movie, I could not get used to the bizarre art style. I understand that it’s trying to look somewhat like the Clone Wars animated clips (see below, as compared to the movie above). The series of 5-minute animated shorts depicting the story of the Clone Wars was aired on Cartoon Network in 2003, and was awesome. The new movie of the same title attempted the same style, but in 3D. It certainly has the same look, but none of the same feel. The animated Clone Wars was like Samurai Jack, but in the Star Wars universe. No surprise, as they were both the work of Genndy Tartakovsky. The animation was fluid, the art style, while certainly very stylized, worked extremely well.

Obi-Wan in the animated TV Clone Wars

This was not true at all for the movie. Everything in the movie looked rigid and hard. You can see what I mean in the above screencaps, just look at Obi Wan’s hair. It doesn’t move at all, in fact it looks like it’s made out of wood. What you can’t see in that screencap is how the faces look like that too, with extremely limited movements, resulting in very un-expressive faces. All of the movement was stiff and ugly, and actually hard to watch. There is also very bizarre selective detail, for example most of the textures are flat colors, but for some reason Yoda has extensive bump-mapping on his skin. It looks extremely strange, because it no longer like he is a stylized character, but a realistic character with a very angular body, due to the detail on his skin. The Hutts aren’t slimy, just large and somehow both fluid and blocky.

Jabba the Hutt

The story revolves around the Hutts, specifically Jabba, his uncle Zero, and his son (who doesn’t seem to have a real name, but is nicknamed “Stinky” by the Jedi that were assigned to rescuing him). The basic plot is that Jabba’s son has been kidnapped, and he has asked the Jedi for assistance in retrieving the infant. The Jedi are reluctant, but at the persuasion of Chancellor Palpatine (another disappointing character, the voice actor doesn’t even sound like Ian McDiarmid), Anakin Skywalker and Obi Wan Kenobi are sent to help. Things get difficult when it is revealed that Count Dooku and the Separatists (who had been helping Jabba while the Jedi deliberated with Palpatine) are behind the kidnap, and are attempting to turn the Hutt Clan against the Jedi.

Ahsoka Tano, Anakin's Padawan

In the midst of all of this, Yoda assigns a padawan apprentice to Anakin, a youngling Togruta named Ahsoka Tano (see above). Let me just start by saying that I hate her more than I hated Jar Jar. She is obnoxiously immature, but Yoda OK’d her for Padawan training despite the fact that she is still a youngling at only 14 years old. She insists on being trained by Anakin, but she doesn’t really seem to learn anything from him, only really offering him criticism and competition. There are a few scenes when one of them points out something that she learned, but I got the feeling that Lucasfilm also noticed that she was a terrible student and tried to add in those scenes to fix the problem.

I was glad that there was very little of R2D2 (or “Artooey,” as Ahsoka nicknamed him) and C3-PO, because as awesome as they were in the original saga, in the prequels the only purpose they served was comic relief, and believe me, there was plenty of that without them. It seemed like the only purpose the battle droids served (other than fodder for the battle scenes) was comic relief. Misunderstanding each other, telling each other to shut up, the droids in this movie were more human than the human characters were.

The soundtrack was not composed by John Williams, and didn’t sound anything like that of the Star Wars saga. It was certainly groovy, but it didn’t have a Star Wars feel to it. Most of it wasn’t orchestral music at all, but much more generic action movie beats. In any other movie, it would have fit the action, but it just felt weird and out of place coupled with Star Wars.

The only thing I actually enjoyed about the movie were the battle scenes, which were impressive. There’s one part where an pair of AT-TEs scale a totally vertical wall, which was completely awesome. The lightsabers glowed, the energy bolts flew (though not quite as fast as they did in the other movies), and the droids glowed red-hot as they were carved by the lightsabers. It was adrenaline-packed, but there was too much of that and not enough of the other things that make a movie into a Star Wars movie.

Star Wars: The Clone Wars was definitely a movie intended for children, not hardcore fans of The Saga. Every aspect of the movie that I didn’t like probably makes it more and more attractive to kids. Gone are the beautiful cinematic panning shots, the glorious Williams soundtrack, the politics, the subtleties of the battle between the Light and Dark Sides of the Force. Instead it’s quick action, cutesy nicknames (“snips” and “sky guy”, as well as artooey and stinky), and too many whiny teenagers. Anakin’s struggle with the Dark Side is barely touched upon, just a few comments about him not wanting to talk about his past, and some scowls when Ahsoka asked too much.

Save yourself some money, don’t bother with this movie. Pirate it, or just skip it entirely. It really was that terrible.

Tagged , , ,