A Series of Tubes

After reading this io9 post (an outraged rant about the new Harry Potter movie), I’ve somewhat revised the opinion presented in my previous post.

While everything I said before remains true, I would like to add that it was, in retrospect, extremely disappointing that there was no funeral for Dumbledore. This scene, in the book, brings almost every living character from the rest of the series back to Hogwarts for the funeral, and it would have been an amazing ending for the movie. Instead, we are treated to a scene in which the population of the school raises their glowing wands to the heavens, and then later, a shot of Fawkes flying off into the distance. No white tomb, no tearful congregation of every amazing character, beast and human alike, that J.K. Rowling has to offer.

Also disappointing, as the article points out, is the lack of a battle between the forces of good and evil. When the Death Eaters arrive, they simply kill Dumbledore, set Hagrid’s hut on fire, and leave with Snape and Malfoy. In the book, there is a rather epic fight scene throughout Hogwarts, where Fenrir Greyback bursts into action, flinging curses right and left into the crowd of teachers and trained students. It’s a great scene, and was ultimately not present, at all, in the movie.

Lastly, to add onto my complaint about Dumbledore’s death scene, Snape was simply not evil. To the casual observer, who knows nothing of the events in book 7, Snape already appears to be a double-crosser for the good side. In the book, Snape kills Dumbledore in cold blood, and truly seems to be evil, to the core. It is later revealed that he is, in fact, a good guy, but in the movie this seems blatantly obvious from his and Dumbledore’s countenances.

I still thought this was a very good Harry Potter movie, and if one had not read the book and known what they were missing out on with the battle and funeral, one would not even notice these problems.

After reading this io9 post (an outraged rant about the new Harry Potter movie), I’ve somewhat revised the opinion presented in my previous post.

While everything I said before remains true, I would like to add that it was, in retrospect, extremely disappointing that there was no funeral for Dumbledore. This scene, in the book, brings almost every living character from the rest of the series back to Hogwarts for the funeral, and it would have been an amazing ending for the movie. Instead, we are treated to a scene in which the population of the school raises their glowing wands to the heavens, and then later, a shot of Fawkes flying off into the distance. No white tomb, no tearful congregation of every amazing character, beast and human alike, that J.K. Rowling has to offer.

Also disappointing, as the article points out, is the lack of a battle between the forces of good and evil. When the Death Eaters arrive, they simply kill Dumbledore, set Hagrid’s hut on fire, and leave with Snape and Malfoy. In the book, there is a rather epic fight scene throughout Hogwarts, where Fenrir Greyback bursts into action, flinging curses right and left into the crowd of teachers and trained students. It’s a great scene, and was ultimately not present, at all, in the movie.

Lastly, to add onto my complaint about Dumbledore’s death scene, Snape was simply not evil. To the casual observer, who knows nothing of the events in book 7, Snape already appears to be a double-crosser for the good side. In the book, Snape kills Dumbledore in cold blood, and truly seems to be evil, to the core. It is later revealed that he is, in fact, a good guy, but in the movie this seems blatantly obvious from his and Dumbledore’s countenances.

I still thought this was a very good Harry Potter movie, and if one had not read the book and known what they were missing out on with the battle and funeral, one would not even notice these problems.

I saw the new Harry Potter yesterday, the sixth in the series. Long story short, I liked it very much. Not quite as much as the third movie, but enough to blow away #5 for second place. The film was much darker than the previous ones, just as the book was darker than the others, but it certainly worked, and made sense. Sirius Black, Harry’s only decent family, was killed at the end of the fifth book/movie, and the Death Eaters are on the rise as Voldemort gains more and more power, so it is only fitting that the movie be as dark as it is. Caution: Spoilers follow.

The movie did a very good job of compressing the sizable book into 2.5 hours. My main complaint about the fourth movie is that it seemed to flash by, never really managing to stay in one place for more than a thirty seconds. The fifth movie was much better with pacing, amazingly fitting the largest book in the seven-part series into a decent-length movie. Now, the sixth movie accomplishes the same feat as the fifth (even if there is less to cram in, there is still a lot of action for a 2.5 hour movie). Admittedly, there were a few places where it felt a teensy bit jumpy (mainly the skipping from Hagrid’s hut to the pensieve shot, and other Dumbledore meetings), and a couple of areas that I would have liked to see much more of (a longer Felix Felicis scene and more from the Half-Blood Prince’s potions book), but the movie overall was very well-paced, I thought.

I loved the special effects in the film, particularly the new pensieve. Memories now appear as black, cloudy swirls on a misty blue background, similar to the appearance of the liquid memories swirling in the bowl. It has a much more magical air to it than the pensieve of previous movies. The movie is full of these black swirly cloud effects, as the Death Eaters also appear as trails of black smoke when they are flying. This addition is a great touch, in my opinion, because it gives the dark lord’s servants a much more powerful, mysterious air than before. The actors portraying the Death Eaters did an extremely good job, particularly the one portraying Fenrir Greyback. The unbreakable vow scene, on a related note, was superb. I never quite understood this scene in the book, but in film it was crystal-clear.

My one major complaint about the movie was that they changed the ending. In the book, as soon as Harry and Dumbledore return from their journey to get the horcrux, the death-eaters are at the school, and Dumbledore paralyzes Harry under the invisiblity cloak, forcing Harry to watch while Snape murders the headmaster. In the movie, Dumbledore simply instructs Harry to hide below, where he actually encounters Snape before the deed is done. This may not seem like that big of a change, but it means that Harry did nothing to stop Snape from killing Dumbledore, even though he easily could. In the book, Harry had very little grounds for blaming himself for Dumbledore’s death, but I feel that in the next movies (and yes, there are two movies left – The Deathly Hallows is being split in half, to draw it out a bit longer), the fact that Harry could have done something to save his beloved headmaster is going to make him even more angsty than he already is. This is disappointing, as the angst-ridden teenagers in the books and movies are the worst part of Harry Potter.

I enjoyed Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince very much, and I think that anybody who enjoyed the sixth book will not be disappointed by this movie.

Why do I still think the third movie is the best? That’s simple – I’m a sucker for time travel.